🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest scams of its nature in the UK.

In all 14 defendants have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28m scheme to cheat over 3,500 timeshare investors.

The affected individuals were keen to get out of decades-old timeshare contracts and tried to find help.

Most were aged between 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and one individual handed over more than £80,000.

Those targeted were exposed to high-pressure sales meetings continuing for six hours. They were financially worse off, holding worthless fake "rewards" and continued to be bound by expensive vacation property deals they could no longer use.

The Business Behind the Deception

The company at the centre of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted clients' cash to finance the directors' opulent standard of living of prestigious schooling, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.

The man at the top of the firm, Mark Rowe, was given a seven and a half year prison term in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his partner Nicola was among the last group to hear their sentences.

She was given a 24-month deferred imprisonment at the London court after pleading guilty to money laundering.

The outcome represents a long time coming and represents a significant success for the individuals who testified, the police and the Crown.

The Way the Investigation Began

The initial awareness of SMT came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the reporting team of a broadcasting service, creating current affairs programmes.

A acquaintance pointed out that his mother had inherited the ownership of a holiday property in the Spanish coast and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to terminate the contract.

It is important to recall how widespread timeshares had evolved with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership enabled families to occupy the equivalent unit annually, or exchange their weeks with additional holders who had units in other resorts. Approximately 600,000 holiday enthusiasts took up that option.

The early surge was linked to a lot of stories about rip-off merchants fraudulently marketing properties. They were regularly featured on investigative TV programmes.

The common vacation property deal bound owners for long periods.

At that time, those owners who had experienced their regular accommodation in the resort for decades were getting older, and a significant number were hoping to wave goodbye to their timeshares.

Several had health issues and couldn't get to their units. Others just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And a portion had deceased, in frequent situations passing on their heirs to assume the contracts - plus their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Undercover Operation Develops

It was at this point the relative had ended up. She looked online for answers and found the company, a enterprise whose website claimed to release her from her agreement.

But, having paid a fee and arranged an appointment with them, her relatives had doubts.

Further research showed many victims saying they had handed over cash and achieved no result from the service. Actually, they had been left out of pocket. Significant sums.

The reporting group began investigating what was going on. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals operating in the holiday ownership market.

A legal professional had many grievance cases waiting to sue the company.

Reporters contacted people who had engaged the company and they all told the same story. They assumed the firm would buy their property off them but when they participated in a session (for which they paid up front) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

In place of that, they were pushed - actually compelled - to spend more money investing in "the company's points system", linked to the outfit's parent company, the parent organization.

The nature of these rewards was rather ambiguous. They appeared to be a type of exchange medium, giving access to discount travel and benefits and shopping deals.

And they were seemingly "exchangeable with fellow investors, at a future date.

Committing funds immediately would result in an eventual payoff that would pay for SMT's fees and result in the timeshare holder ahead financially, freed at last from their pesky agreement.

Too good to be true? Well, yes.

A 'Deceptive Tactic'

If these accounts were true, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "misleading sales."

Someone - specifically the organization - "lures the client by marketing a specific service only to then claim it is unavailable, pushing the client towards an alternative, lesser offering.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the evidence we had assembled, we made the case to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.

Such an operation demands time, effort, and clear arguments for why this is the sole method to collect the information necessary to prove wrongdoing.

Armed with that permission, our limited crew set up a consultation with one of the firm's agents in the location.

Acting as a ordinary individual wanting to assist his parent out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement